Section 263:
Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue.
(1) The 1
Principal Commissioner or
Commissioner may call for and examine the record of any proceeding under this Act, and if he considers
that any order passed therein by the 2
Assessing Officer is erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the
interests of the revenue, he may, after giving the assessee an opportunity of being heard and after making
or causing to be made such inquiry as he deems necessary, pass such order thereon as the circumstances
of the case justify, including an order enhancing or modifying the assessment, or cancelling the
assessment and directing a fresh assessment.
34
Explanation 1.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that, for the purposes of this
sub-section,—
(a) an order passed 5
on or before or after the 1st day of June, 1988 by the Assessing Officer
shall include—
(i) an order of assessment made by the 6
Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
or the Income-tax Officer on the basis of the directions issued by the 7
Joint Commissioner under
section 144A;
(ii) an order made by the 7
Joint Commissioner in exercise of the powers or in the
performance of the functions of an Assessing Officer conferred on, or assigned to, him under the
orders or directions issued by the Board or by the 8
Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief
Commissioner or 9
Principal Director General or Director General or 1
Principal Commissioner
or Commissioner authorised by the Board in this behalf under section 120;
(b) “record”10shall include and shall be deemed always to have included all records relating to
any proceeding under this Act available at the time of examination by the 1
Principal Commissioner
or Commissioner;
(c) where any order referred to in this sub-section and passed by the Assessing Officer had been
the subject matter of any appeal 5
filed on or before or after the 1st day of June, 1988, the powers of
the 1
Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under this sub-section shall extend 11and shall be
deemed always to have extended to such matters as had not been considered and decided in such
appeal.
12
Explanation 2.—For the purposes of this section, it is hereby declared that an order passed by the
Assessing Officer shall be deemed to be erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interests of the
revenue, if, in the opinion of the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner,—
(a) the order is passed without making inquiries or verification which should have been made;
(b) the order is passed allowing any relief without inquiring into the claim;
(c) the order has not been made in accordance with any order, direction or instruction issued by
the Board under section 119; or
(d) the order has not been passed in accordance with any decision which is prejudicial to the
assessee, rendered by the jurisdictional High Court or Supreme Court in the case of the assessee or
any other person.
13
(2) No order shall be made under sub-section (1) after the expiry of two years from the end of the
financial year in which the order sought to be revised was passed.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (2), an order in revision under this section may
be passed at any time in the case of an order which has been passed in consequence of, or to give effect
to, any finding or direction contained in an order of the Appellate Tribunal, 14
National Tax Tribunal, the
High Court or the Supreme Court.
Explanation.—In computing the period of limitation for the purposes of sub-section (2), the time
taken in giving an opportunity to the assessee to be reheard under the proviso to section 129 and any
period during which any proceeding under this section is stayed by an order or injunction of any court
shall be excluded.
Notes:
1. Subs. by Act 25 of 2014, s. 4, for “Commissioner” (w.e.f. 1-6-2013).
2. Subs. by Act 4 of 1988, s. 2, for “Income-tax Officer” (w.e.f. 1-4-1988).
3. Subs. by Act 26 of 1988, s. 44, for the Explanation (w.e.f. 1-6-1988).
4. The Explanation numbered as Explanation 1 thereof by Act 20 of 2015, s. 67 (w.e.f. 1-6-2015).
5. Ins. by Act 13 of 1989, s. 23 (w.e.f. 1-6-1988).
6. Subs. by Act 21 of 1998, s. 3, for “Assistant Commissioner” (w.e.f. 1-10-1998).
7. Subs. by s. 3, ibid., for “Deputy Commissioner” (w.e.f. 1-10-1998).
8. Subs. by Act 25 of 2014, s. 4, for “Chief Commissioner” (w.e.f. 1-6-2013).
9. Subs. by s. 4, ibid., for “Director General” (w.e.f. 1-6-2013).
10. Subs. by Act 13 of 1989, s. 23, for “includes” (1-6-1988).
11 Ins. by s. 23, ibid. (w.e.f. 1-6-1988).
12. Ins. by Act 20 of 2015, s. 67 (w.e.f. 1-6-2015).
13. Subs. by Act 67 of 1984, s. 47, for sub-section (2) (w.e.f. 1-10-1984).
14. The words in bracket shall stand inserted (date to be notified) by Act 49 of 2005, s. 30 and the Schedule (This amendment
has been struck down by the Supreme Court’s Order dated 25th September, 2014 in the Madras Bar Association Vs.
Union of India.).