Section 139:
Any person, whose property has been distrained for arrear of rent alleged to be due from another, may institute a suit against the distrainer, &c.
If any person shall claim as his own,
property which has been distrained for arrears of rent alleged to be due from any other person, such
person may institute a suit against the distrainer and such other person, to try the right to the property, in
the same manner, and under the same conditions as to the time of instituting the suit and to the
consequent postponement of sale, as a person whose property has been distrained for an arrear of rent
alleged to be due from him may institute a suit to contest the demand. When any such suit is instituted
the property may be released upon security being given for the value of the same. If the claim is dismissed
the Collector shall make an order for the sale of the property or the recovery of the value thereof, as the
case may be, for the benefit of the distrainer. If the claim is upheld, the Collector shall decree the release
of the distrained property with costs, and such damages (if any) as the circumstances of the case may
seem to require.
Proviso.— Provided always that no claim to any produce of land liable to distraint under this Act,
which at the time of the distress may have been found in the possession of a defaulting cultivator, whether
such claim be in respect of a previous sale, mortgage, or otherwise, shall bar the prior claim of the person
entitled to the rent of the land, nor shall any attachment in execution of a judgment of any Civil Court
prevail against such prior claim.